Clarifying terms

It occurs to me that much of the confusion in this field comes from the convolution of terms with similar meanings under the vague 'ether'. On the one hand we have whatever it is (space? ether? stresses in ether?) that is bounded by magneto or dielectric vortices (with or without charged particles), bound inside/outside wires, bound inside/outside nucleic particles, etc. JJ Thompson, the guy who discovered the electron, used the term Ether. At this point I am quite confortable conceptializing this form just as a shaping of space (and counterspace?). The other term which is regularly referred to as Ether is the ambipolar neutrino radiation with oscillating mass, oscillating charge, and various species as a function of both frequency and wavelength. This form also goes under the terms massfree orgone energy, cosmic orgone energy, neutrino, ambipolar radiation, vril flux, radiant matter, radiant energy, and a variety of other names. Note that both of these are distinct from the notion of a purely mechanical ether. Which begs the question, what are the proper terms for these three species of distinct concepts?